Process

Berkeley, Sunday, September 20, 2026 1:34 am

I will write the title entry at least.

Thanks to the Lord in first place. Yesterday, Saturday was a fairly good day.

Biking uphill

It is good pressure to work with someone, screen by screen at the library or might be elsewhere.

Moffit library has great tables. I have explored the third floor a bit.

On Thursday, my colleague and I worked there.

I also have been at the new wonderful tables and wood chairs on the way to Main Stacks, or Main Gardner.

A massive error. I told to my friend the remodeling of the library was expensive. Of course I gave the amount that I saw somehow. But I think in the skimming of sources, my memory pulled the cost from a dam. Sometimes I thing the memory throwing the material as an old mechanical typewriter where with an arm will print the letter you type on paper.

Well, the Moffitt cost was fifty-eight million U.S. dollars. It looks good. Though the canals to collect water from the asphalt path and bringing to a pipe look odd. It might collapse quickly. I had a quick look at the landscape work, when I took a break from the underground in Main Stacks!

What a beautiful court next to the North Fork of Strawberry Creek. It had a square of great rounded good wood from Redwood, and in between large standing redwood trees, with the freshness, of the yet to be restored creek flowing by.

I put my attention elsewhere. What else have I learned, beyond my work.

24 or so, field medallist, which in mathematics is the equivalent of a Nobel Prize objected against a.i. I think it was agains open a.i. in particular. My view, which I agree with something said on the paper, this was recently published in The Economist. It is that just eating in restaurant might not be good. There is something important to realizing in your nutrition when you get the products, cook, and achieve a final outcome. There is something in food that is beyond energy. So, if one is a student or a professional, might be a more promiscuous example, something wrong with prostitution will be that it can be focused only on the a product. Might same in relationships, or in a work, etcetera. The process has challenges, when the mind, the body, the skills are learn. Might be the prostitution could be still a good example. But now away from the person, back to the machine, artificial intelligence, which is a generalist name, such as a climate change is also an umbrella for many things. I am not an expert on computing, but let make a guess that this tool, and particularly the method is called large language models? It can be just an assistant. One can get better with using a tool. Like a wrench. Like a pen. Like a keyboard. Or like producing controlled fire on a stove without burning a kitchen. Or like learning to weave with crochet, and then also learning about other technics with a sophisticated weaving machine which can be semiautomatic, where you use not only your hands but also your feet. Might a tool if needed can be used for the purposes needed. The hammer need a human to hit the nail. But the nail might be bolt. Then you need a wrench. It can be done automatically like robots assembling cars, I imagine. Well that is another tool, at another level, requested and taught by someone. Humans, unless they are not fully alive, even then, won’t be allowed to be manipulated. One can identify things. And get into the details of things as needed. Particularly, if it is a potential new tool which can be applicable in one’s jobs.

I think the direction and learning the details, particularly in coding is a key thing. And it is helpful.

Those machines make errors, that is why in depth knowledge reading, field understanding, quick math calculations.

In terms of language I do not know yet. Each person has a voice, a tone, which sometimes speaks loudly on pages. Even if incorrect.

That is a key part to push back against the use of the tool. That is the mono-culture. Things that right without critical thinking. Politeness. Lack of conflict. Solutions for everything, but not finding problems. Might be wrong questions. Imperfection.

Well, I guess in the art of coding that is also a concern. At the end those have been elaborated multiple language. The tool might be helping with catch up. No everyone needs to be a mechanic to drive a car, although knowledge is very helpful in there. Same here. But the mathematical, physics, fields, representation of a world, in modeled linguistic languages by excellent writers, same as by brilliant minds through equations, and still simplified through complex models with measured variables. I think it is a great advance a great catch up. The question for the scientist would be, and of course the concern, to not to teach to get the result, the final product, which is good to get it, but to show the whole process. That is a meaninful thing. As it always have been. The devil is in the details, really? I won’t thing is the opposite or different. I meant who knows about that real being, and where he is. But sometimes is present might be in details of discouragement, or in obstruction. So, it can be present in big picture or small picture. But details are important.